Welcome to my e-book: Manipulism - And the Weapon of Guilt – The final death of Karl Marx.

"As a former socialist, now libertarian, who is born and raised in Denmark (supposedly the “happiest” nation on earth) I have devoted my life to alert the world about the danger of socialism. I am often asked why I have not yet published a book, though I will. Official release date is March 14th 2013. However, spreading the truth is more important to me than making money. I therefore use the web.

Please share this book with friends and support my effort to educate the world. Because how can anyone truly fight anything if one is not 100% aware and can simultaneously describe exactly what one is fighting? This book is therefore dedicated to the Earth’s least liberated society: The United States of America.

My intention with this book is to prove that one single voice 'with the right words' can have the roar of a million. To liberate my country and influence the world by creating a precise understanding of socialism and thereby, simply with the weapon of irrefutable knowledge immobilize socialism. Quite simply because socialism can never be achieved with exposure.

No one has ever described the mind-game of oppressive inhibitive socialistic psychological manipulation and reverse psychology. This disclosure: so controversial and comprehensively detailed, that Denmark's most supposedly liberal newspaper; ironically the same newspaper that published the Muhammad Drawings in 2005 in the name of freedom of speech, will not review my book.

The intimidations, threats and deception generally as an attempt to discredit me and denial of this book’s honesty and preciseness are all worth my while. As the eventual raised questions and societal outcome/changes caused by this book, will speak for itself. Wars should be fought with words - the right words, and never though coercion or terror. Therefore welcome to my words of revolution."

Introduction

Our radicalized, socialistically influenced consciousness has created a supposedly wonderful and caring collective society that takes care of almost everyone. One collectivism; the family’s obligation to parent for their children, completely disabled and replaced with Mother Denmark - the government. A new collectivism which has essentially immobilized individual effort by parenting and nourishing the Danes from birth until death. Life designed completely without any kind of consequence. The result is a non-defiant, passive and absolutely authoritarian nation. In no way different from the former East-Germany or the Soviet Union; what the master commands the puppet does. Citizens who never question anything, unless of course something is to be taken away. Since my childhood this country has been on an absolute standstill. Stagnation is in effect.

This small Scandinavian country, placed in the northern part of Europe, is hated by many and famously symbolized by others for upholding limitless freedom of speech. A freedom of speech, which in reality apply only until one has a critical opinion about Denmark itself. It is a bureaucratic country with laws for absolutely everything. Yet there is no actual justice or punishment for breaking them. Any criminal’s heaven, with such lack of consequence where one could literally kill 5 people intentionally and yet still die a free citizen. While in this nanny nation (where everything is served on a silver platter) the question is not if one needs to work but if one actually cares to. Breast implants, free holidays and artificial impregnation (to people who obviously can not even afford a child in the first place) have slowly sneaked its way onto the menu of almost unlimited social benefits. To some this would with no doubt sound great, yet, in reality it is quite the contrary. In an attempt to protect what has now ended up in absolute socialistic greed, because democracy itself can’t facilitate socialism, the socialists have taken awful methods of suppressive, psychological manipulation and reverse psychology in to use. Orchestrated, designed and absolutely calculated psychological manipulation. Mind-snatching identical to the methods commonly known as the svengali technique. This results in weakening the general society, and even worse society’s weakest citizens, the socialists. Controversially, this again only empowers the socialistic part of society even further. The more deprived, and thereby the more mentally inhibited, the stronger the socialist.

Even a child can promote socialism but it takes an intellectual to truly explain liberalism. As a Dane who was born and raised in Denmark I will, through my personal knowledge of my country, my culture and its citizens, carefully take the reader step by step through, more or less, 10 years of extensive sociological research and observations. And thereby prove that the happiest people on Earth, who are supposedly the Danes, is socialism’s absolute biggest propaganda hoax. I further intend to prove that Danes (all socialists and radicalized liberals in some degree) being totalitarianized, unlike libertarians, don’t have the option of anything but to imagine being happy. This book will further carefully teach the reader how a socialistically influenced government, in this case Denmark’s, is controlled by only a minority of society’s weakest citizens which disables and mentally enslaves the majority of its citizens. The result is similar in nature to the Stockholm syndrome. By creating falsified contentment with free social benefits, combined with suppressive socialistic inhibitions, psychological manipulation and reverse psychology, results in the perfect societal mind control - Manipulism.

I will further teach how my former ideology, 'socialism'/communism, works sociologically and psychologically. And thereby prove that the key, which facilitates socialism, is low self-esteem. Ideologies founded and facilitated on one single source - belittling each other. In that way destroying true individualism and mental freedom in its goal to accomplish the perfect human organism. Thereby equilibrium, ultimately creating perfect totalitarian human beings. Insecure people who are, or will be, on an absolute standstill through most of their life. People who cannot truly take (or even respond responsibly) to any criticism. People who are more or less disabled from questioning or criticizing their ideology, the government or their country. All the result of perfect suppressive socialistic mind control, with an iron-grip so powerful that it reaches the farthest most liberal parties of society, radicalizing otherwise liberal politics. In other words this book will explain exactly how Denmark accomplished to create the world’s most seemingly free, but perfect totalitarian society. Or what I prefer to refer to as Neo-communism.

The following disclosure is absolutely not unique to Denmark. This book only uses Denmark as an example. Although no country in the world could ever illustrate a better example. While Denmark and other Scandinavian societies are truly exceptional - quite unlike anywhere else. This course is in various degrees identical for all countries (in the new monopolized democratic socialism Super State) - the European Union. In fact, this process is in some degree taking place all over the world. Even in the United States.

If anything slightly positive is to be said about socialism; would be, that Scandinavia's democratic socialism is history’s closest attempt to succeed in accomplishing the impossible. Yet accomplished only because Denmark is a small society with a population of a mere 5.5 million. And through absolute mental intimidation, secrecy and denial. If it was not for what this book is essentially about, socialism’s awful social-psychological secrets - I would indifferently still be a socialist today. In reality the democratic process, merely balanced by radicalized liberals, is the only measure keeping the socialist part of society from showing their true fascist agenda.

"The perfect totalitarian state, is one where the all powerful political bosses, and their army of managers, control a population of slaves, who do not have to be coerced because they love their servitude". - Pat Buchanan

Chapter One

I once sat and admired my daughter, age 6, doing crazy things interactively with a children's program on TV. At one point she glanced at me, smiled and said: "Am I not clever daddy?”. "Yes you are very, very clever," I replied. The situation made me think about the mental freedom that my daughter still possesses. A mental freedom still liberated from my countries socialistic inhibitions, a mental freedom that she will be deprived of by socialisms strong psychological iron-grip here in Denmark, if I do not teach her how to protect herself from it. A mental prison of socialistic inhibitions, a mentality misunderstood and misinterpreted through almost a century, simply as Scandinavian mentality, described as the 'Jante-Law'.

I once read a joke describing suppressive socialist and communist mentality:

A journalist had ended up in Hell. He looked around and saw great bonfires with big pots placed on top. One pot for each ideology in which its citizens were boiling. Demons guarded each pot so no one could escape, except by the socialist and communist pots where no one stood guard. Thinking this was odd he sought advice from Devil and asked; "why are the socialist and communist pots the only pots without guards?" The Devil replied; "No need to! Should anyone try to pull themselves up, their fellow citizens will make sure to pull them back down again!"

 Socialism propaganda misleads even the smartest minds ...

            The Jante-Law

Jante-Law is unquestionably not a unique Scandinavian phenomenon. The mentality is commonly known worldwide referred to in countries such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada and Brittan as Tall-Poppy-Syndrome which describes an undermining condition where one is driven by low self-esteem. However, the Jante-Law first described in the novel 'A fugitive crosses his track' in 1933 by the Danish author Axel Sandemose. He describes his observations and thoughts of the Danish society's inhibitive mentality and named it the Jante-Law. Though more or less an exact description of socialistic mentality, it still has a few inconsistencies. Once again, a mentality known best around the world as Tall-Poppy-Syndrome. An example could be that one is allowed to think greatly of oneself. One is just not allowed to express it. I have therefore carefully clarified the mentality for which basis I elaborate in the following description of the mentality's behavior.

●  Social-psychological theory: Manipulism - ''To lower self-esteem, ultimately generating feelings of inferiority and dependability - to thereby facilitate complete control with fictive contentment.

Until now the Tall-Poppy-Syndrome has never been truly clarified which refers to a powerful mentality that all socialistically influenced countries are subject to in some degree, depending on the level of socialistic influence. A mentality which when adopted by socialists and communists unequivocally transforms into manipulism.

            Manipulism - Inhibitive rules; emotions of socialists and communists

            ●   3. Don't express superiority!
            ●   4. Don't express status!

            ●   5. Don't express pride!
            ●   6. Don't express individuality!
            ●   7. Don't try to educate!

Childcarers, known as pedagogues, and public school teachers are professions which are with almost no exceptions occupied by the socialists. Therefore the manipulative part in this mind-game (the part that no socialist wants you to know) is that the daycare and public school system (governmental indoctrination program) are where the socialistic personality mind-control “Manipulism” is largely implemented. It is a slow process of constant correctional lectures (not to express pride or any kind of superiority), in perfect harmony with society's belittlement, ensuing inferiority, therefore necessitating dependability, radicalizing even the most liberated child.

In this country the governmental big brother is everywhere. To socialize over a beer after work with your coworkers is out of the question. At least if the next step in your daily routine is to pick up your children from daycare. Since just smelling of one beer, actually gives these childcarers authority not to hand over your children. These childcarers, hired as governmental watchdogs, keep a constant eye on your movements. Something as simple as not having a stable routine (privacy) can be seen as a sign of troubles in the family. No private life in this society.

Starting from birth, the menu of social goodies free of (personale) charge are almost unlimited in Denmark. Social benefits most people in the world have never dreamt of or ever heard about. It is therefore actually easier to mention the only two which are not. Dental care - though free of (personale) charge until the age of 18. And daycare - which is determined by family income. Ranging from only a few hundred, yet free of (personale) charge if collecting social security or student funding. Yes you heard right, in this country one is actually paid to study and education is free of (personale) charge all the way until and with university. Education being one of the most vital parts - to purchase votes, in order for socialism to prosper. Socialistic parties collect their greatest percentage of votes from first hand voters - people who are inexperienced in politics and young people who are taking an education.

Like playing with fire, social benefits too easily totalitarianize (because the dog never bites the hand that feeds it), disable individual effort and criticism. Criticism which is absolutely vital to depower the government and to increase educational and commercial quality and service levels. If one knows what to look for, manipulism’s ways of indoctrinating, belittlement and envy can be found in everything and everywhere. All the way from educational material to pamphlets to music. Even kids songs, TV-shows and advertisement. Therefore in order to finalize this book I undertook a social science class consequently, to observe behavior and teaching methods. With one question in mind – how highly educated people can be kept or keep themselves away from realizing reality. The experience was astounding and I can say with 100% certainty that not one of the participating students in the course of a whole year’s education ever moved an inch politically. Studies based more on learning terminology (to sound rather educated) than actual social science facts. The libertarian economist Friedman was mentioned (once by name) but Keynes, the socialist’s economist was the name of the game. I even once observed the teacher conferring with a student with pride and excitement about how the university she had attended, openly indoctrinated academic delegates, into voting for a specific radicalized socialist party. A teacher who; regardless of how much I intentionally provoked her with controversial questions, would simply defer to another subject, seem uninterested or never answer.

Socialistic inhibitions can be found in approximately 98% of the Danish population, since the socialistic inhibitions are programmed from early childhood. Inhibitions are therefore created subconsciously and involuntary. Consequently, the socialistically under minded has very little understanding of, or control over, these inhibitive emotions. And with only one truly liberated nation left in the world - The United States, no one has anything to compare with. It personally took me more the ten years of traveling the whole world before I truly started to understand. This demonstrates exactly how strong and powerful the iron-grip of socialism truthfully is.

The level of how much one understands this mentality is evidently determined by the level in which one has stood up against it. All Danes know that the mentality thrives. Yet, in order for socialism to prosper it is vital that the truth never gets out. Once again, socialism can never be achieved with exposure. Absolute denial or by pretending that the mentality is either old fashion (which they pretend to believe does not really exist presently) or that it does not truly affect them, becomes the best weapon.

A socialist will read this book. Yet, in an attempt to deny not really read it. And instead, subconsciously, look for ways to defer themselves from the facts. Any excuse is valid. If it is not a spelling mistake, or not enough proof, then they will want to see proof of a PHD. Yet, if they are shown a PHD, then proof of a PHD is not enough. (Unless of course one uses the PHD to establish how happy Danes are). A socialist will always deny or belittle, yet never research.

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they attack you, and then you win" - Mahatma Ghandi

Chapter Two

The frequent use of terminology like the word arrogance is a major part of the socialistic mind-game. Again the intent is reverse psychology, to intimidate and force guilt upon any individual who expresses pride or superiority. Simultaneously making the individual who use terminology, stand out (to the uneducated) as well-educated. Yet, individuals actually using this terminology can in reality hardly ever define a simple term like arrogance.

I once heard a wise and appealing story concerning the topic of the socialistic and communistic mentality:

A man describes how whilst in the United States he once was inspired by an American. Whilst in the process of elaborating the socialistic/communistic mentality, “manipulism”, the male notices the American oddly nodding, seemingly agreeing positively to the topic. When the man finishes explaining, the American smiled and said "Great, good for you!". Surprised by the comment the male asked "What do you mean by that?". The American then replied "If everyone else in your country is so busy not believing in themselves, well, then there is just so much more room for your success!"

The gap between arrogance (an individual who refuse to believe others could be, or know better), and narcissism (to worship oneself) is not immense. Yet, the example above of the uplifting uninhibited liberated behavior described below (the right to be proud and express it) is a vital psychological tool for all of society to create self-esteem. A mentality many Americans have absolutely no clue is the actual force behind (Anyone can have success) - 'The American Dream', Driving Americas (the world's strongest) economic success.

            Liberated mentality - Uninhibited behavior; endorsing self-esteem - The weapon against socialism.

            ●   6. Express individuality!
            ●   7. Always listen and educate!

The universe of social-psychology, when understood, is a universe of true mental freedom. Self-confidence and self-esteem are linked, yet very different. Self-confidence is dynamic and describes motivation, willingness and abilities to interact socially in society. Self-esteem is somewhat more passive and not always easy to detect. Someone with low self-esteem can easily appear and act confident. Self-esteem describes an individual’s general (subconscious perception) of his or her own worth. The individual’s perception of oneself and how the individual believes others see them and feel about them.

One does not need to possess greater psychological understanding to realize that all people create self-esteem through proving themselves or being approved of. But as the socialist, bound by these socialistic inhibitions is not allowed to express true pride, the socialist suffers from constant lack of self-esteem. Therefore, since the socialist is driven by feelings of inferiority (inhibitions), again produced by low self-esteem, this liberated behavior (pride) is considered arrogant. Observed from the mind of a socialist; any sign of superiority triggers the socialist to feel inferior. This makes them feel degraded. Which create an urge to belittle. In other words I feel like nothing so you should too.

The fact is socialistic mentality drives people to live a dependent life of envy. Unlike liberated mentality which encourages the individual to turn one’s envy into encouragement (uninhibitedly), by looking up to people of a better standing - people who believe in themselves and express it and thereby trying to reach the same accomplishments. It is completely opposite to socialistic mentality. Liberated mentality instead creates a positive societal circle. What I refer to as America's social security (always a shoulder-clap of encouragement) which in that way raises levels of self-esteem for all of society.

To accomplish socialism, thereby equilibrium, necessary societal assimilation has the outmost importance. A true slayer of individualism, nationalism, arrogance and racism. Enslaved by socialistic inhibitions and therefore forced not to show true signs of individualism or confidence, the socialist being bound to find one’s personal self-esteem elsewhere. Only two ways empowers the individual to build ones self-esteem: either found in sports or by replacing ones self-esteem with nationalistic feelings (collective narcissism).

Therefore, I could refer to the Muhammad Drawings when I say, no matter how hypocritical it may sound, the socialistic mentality purposely allows the individual, who is otherwise not allowed to feel superior, to feel superior by demeaning or criticizing other nationalities, lifestyles, traditions or ways of thinking. Inclined to reject that any other nation could be even slightly better or at least the same (collective arrogance). This allows the individual to create falsified self-esteem by feeling superiority to other nationalities; perfectly replacing their own personal low self-esteem, with strong nationalistic feelings. Once again, empowering the unity - assimilation of the socialistic human organism.

The Danish youth in general is almost in competition of who is the best at speaking English; generally American English, for some with almost a flawless Americanized accent. Which for Denmark’s bystander (visiting tourists) makes Danes stand out as well educated. Yet having a debate with a well-educated Dane, about even the simplest facts about politics will show a completely different story. And controversially, the reason why these individuals speak English as well as they do. Is because this is one of the only places where one can actually break manipulism’s societal rules in secret. Thereby raising self-esteem, by subconsciously declaring aloud (I am better than you), yet without actually stating it directly.

“To fail is only human” is with no doubt the best excuse the socialist have ever invented. This phrase is used constantly, enabling the individual to escape any personal self-criticism. Other frequently used phrases of reverse psychology, with the intent to create guilt are “You're greedy!” and “Americans, liberals, the rich and capitalists etc., only think about themselves!”. Yet, when asking the same individual if he or she can actually describe what capitalism or liberalism is, or if they in fact have ever been to the United States (though education is free of (personale) charge in Denmark) the answer, with almost no exceptions is "No!"

In order to understand socialism it is vital to understand that socialism is a mental state created by the weak mind. And that the foundation which drives socialism is low self-esteem creating feelings of inferiority which therefore drives the socialist to belittle others in order to try to raise one’s self from feeling lesser worthy; in the process dragging other people into their psychological mind-game by lowering their self-esteem. The result is the infinite evil circle of psychological terrorism; manipulism - a socialist’s everyday occupation.

Controversially, socialists has hiltet an exclusive right to refer to themselves as humanists. Though, one would argue that a humanist is not someone who takes from others by force and thereafter shares it around. But that a humanist is someone who voluntarily shares 'ones' own private wealth and time.

It is equally important to understand that socialists are truly hypnotized by the belief that they are doing good with what they stand for. To care for the weakest, is without any doubt is an indisputably beautiful philosophy. This blinds them from the fact that everything refers back to their personal feelings of inferiority, fear and needs which then drives them to turn their envy, and often feelings of societal neglect, into resentment and anger for those who are better off. In other words, using people of a better standing psychologically and economically as their scapegoats. Most importantly, is to understand what liberated mentality is, and stand up 'in any way' against the socialists constant attempts to belittle, manipulate and differ the liberated from expressing pride and superiority - the truly liberated way.

"Socialism only works in two places: Heaven where they don't need it and hell where they already have it." - Ronald Reagan.

Chapter Three

Happiness (Social) in Question

All these inhibitive rules are hard to truly clarify. Although there are two 'unwritten rules' within the mentality which are in fact the easiest to explain. An individual who shows pride or expresses ones achievements is in absolute breach of these inhibitions. In contrary to the first 'unwritten rule', these inhibited rules are not breached if an individual shows pride or utters one’s approval of another individual's achievements or status.

The second rule, a truly deceiving yet absolutely vital dynamic in the socialistic mind-game, is blinding anyone who doesn’t know the true nature - psyche of the socialists. It is that socialists constantly seem to encourage, yet at the same time as the attempt to equilibrate suppresses. A process that would otherwise create depression and it does. Therefore this actually only makes up for the suppression created when demeaning and humiliating another’s performance, professionalism, success and happiness.

The one thing that can truly set off the socialists inhibitive emotions is encouraging oneself, when being encouraged. As encouragement is the socialistic human organism’s constant attempt to keep harmony of this suppression, simultaneously enabling the socialistic human organism to be completely in charge of self-esteem on an individual level.

1. Inhibition: Don't criticize society, its citizens or society's structure

            ●   2. If you a not happy here than why don’t you move away!

It is probable that you have already known of a similar mentally since childhood, as your parents are likely to have read out loud the world famous children’s story: The Ugly Duckling, written by the Danish author Hans Christian Andersen, released in 1843. The story is thought to be his personal way of describing how Denmark made him feel living under minded by similar societal norms found to have existed in European feudal times. This makes absolute sense since in the 1700th - 1800th century ideology of conservatism, like in socialism,  everyone had an exact place in society. This suggests that some type of similar mentality must have held society in place. And because these social norms are often more common for conservatives, my research suggests that it is easier to convert to socialism from the conservative mind, rather than from the libertarian.

Big brother Within (The Weapon of Guilt)

 German documentary 1/14 - The Lives of Others (English Subtitles).

Socialism: to equilibrate by taking from the ones who are better of (in the name of envy) and dividing the country’s assets, similar to Robin Hood, as equally as possible between its citizens. And welfare: to care for society’s weakest, is truly immense. The word social in socialism completely deceives the words true meaning. A word which most are persuaded to think defines communal, together or sharing. Yet social in reality only defines communism’s attempt to compete with capitalism. By 'seemingly' allowing (social class defenses). Yet, even mentioning class differences is fiercely rejected. And by 'seemingly' allowing ownership of personal property. Yet, caused and controlled by extreme tax-levels, you will never truly own anything. So regardless if one describes it as Marxism, humanism, collectivism, welfare society, socialistic democracy or democratic socialism etc. Socialism is but the intent (the first step) to facilitate communism.

Apart from being a democracy, Denmark’s lifestyle has essentially the same structure and aspects as actual communism. The only difference from society being owned by everyone (communism) and Denmark’s neo-communism is alternately; though no democracy justifies stealing, the state completely controls society with legalized political corruption (outrageous taxation). Political statistics for Danish elections shows that 90% focuses on equilibrium, welfare and socialism. Only 10% concerning economics. Proving the exact political imbalance, or in other words "what I want" and furthermore - ignorance. The Danes are the world's highest taxed people. The infrastructure is completely monopolized, corrupted by governmental favoritism. The government being the country's absolute biggest employer in direct competition with private business and industry and, like communism, more or less everything is owned by the government; all the way from public housing, daycare, schools, universities, aviation, railways, communications and power plants. Even corner stores (kiosks) and hotels (controversially, again caused by favoritism the two tallest and buildings in the country). Yet again creating governmental favoritism since people rely upon these jobs for their livelihood.

In this part of the world (Scandinavia), supposedly known to have less corruption, electoral misconduct is an absolute fact. Anyone in Denmark can vote without any valid identification. When I actually confronted a government official with the issue, again proving how authoritarian these people are - the only answer I got was “well, one can go to prison for fraud”. The truly controversial part is how the Danish government purposely makes it hard to build a business. Again irrefutable proof shows that owning a business leads people towards liberating themselves. Controversially socialist politics are established on: 'All are and should be treated equally'. However there is discrimination by supporting a tax increase of 68%, if one makes more than US$75,000 annually. What many have come to refer to as ‘envy-tax’ which is supported by all but one party in Denmark. The most liberal, Liberal Alliance. This is the reason why less than one tenth of the Danish population make over a US$100,000 annually. And with the extreme high cost of living caused by a sales-tax of 25%, on top of extra duties applied to almost everything, all the way from gasoline to candy. An annual income in Denmark of US$75,000, is actually the equivalent to an approximate annual income in the United States, between only US$30-40,000. The sales-duty on a car is 180% which easily brings a US$20,000 car in the United States up to an astounding US$60,000 in Denmark. So the ones who can not afford a car, which is more than half of Denmark’s population, the majority ride a bicycle. And now that green is the newest trend, giving them yet another excuse to lie to themselves.

One could be persuaded to think that socialism helps the poorest and gives the middleclass more. The truth is quite the opposite. It is absolutely correct that socialism divides money more equally and creates some security. But when socialism has taken its effect the fact is there is much less money to divide. Denmark's democratic socialism; what Danes prefer to call a socialistic democratic welfare society (again to keep people for the truth) is but another attempt to do what has already been tried too many times before, and failed. History suggests that socialism could work in a smaller community. But never as a society.

The problem with socialism is that it spoils (positive), thereby disabling individual effort. People simply stop caring less about reaching higher limits, as the reason for the reword of accomplishment is misplaced. Consequentially disabling people from higher values because they never have or will be truly tested. The natural chain of self-motivation and innovation is immobilized. Society is weakened. Creating at humongous middleclass with constant demands for more, rather than giving. A socialist is in no way any different from the rich mans spoiled child. Give the socialist a hand and eventually they will demand the whole arm. Many citizens will even go as far as to speculating if one actually cares to find employment or if one should utilize the social system. Not to forget manipulism’s constant tyranny of coercive psychological socialistic intimidation. Which in combination with the tax-increase leads to constant demands for higher salaries, which further spoils (negative) competitiveness for both private businesses and industry. Keynes economics is in fact what happened simultaneously in this process, as these lost jobs have now been replaced with social benefit jobs in the government. A cycle that will continue growing the government, whilst taxes and salaries increase again and again. Until private businesses and industry has eventually shrunk to such extremes, that the government will need to find the money elsewhere - again in your pocket. This will lead to even higher increases in sales-taxes and salaries, which eventually raise living expenses to a level 2 - 3 times above average. Taxes and expenses which will by no means make up for the small return of socialism’s social benefits. Hypocritically the one this is toughest on is not the aristocrat with lots of money but in fact the average citizen. Eventually society reaches stagnation.

Yet only now (for the liberated observer) the truly fun part begins. As the government is now in absolute need of make believe. And will therefore come up with any excuse, to defer and manipulate its citizens in order to persuade them that higher taxes and duties are absolutely necessary. Which is absolutely no problem, as society has now accomplished totalitarianism. Spoilt by socialism, its citizens, weakened by inferiority and therefore off with the fairies, see absolutely no limit to authority (the government takes care of me), and therefore don't question or criticize society and society’s structure. Unless of course if something is to be taken away. Controversially, the argument every time for raising taxes and duties is “we the government, know what is best .. and you, the citizens are too stupid and therefore can’t think for yourselves. Therefore we will have to raise taxes and duties on - (the following are only examples); candy and solarium – as it is unhealthy”.

Eventually the result of governmental lazynizeation; though before we start, I should state that socialism does has 'one' good side - a lower amount of street people. Denmark’s rate is between only 8000 – 10.000. The equivalent of only 20% when compared to a rate like the United States’. Yet, what about the remaining 80%, which this great example will show; a recent debate about poverty in Denmark. Best known as, (the Carina Debate). About self-proclaimed poor Carina (with no disabilities) on social security for 12 years straight. A claim which was backed up by the socialist parties. Carina’s claim was that she was so poor that she could not afford a cinema ticket for her child on her monthly social security income of a little over US$3000 after tax. If you are not amazed yet. The reason why she actually claimed not to afford a cinema ticket was that she had just bought a US$900 sofa. And when the debating politicians entered her decent middle-class apartment. It was observed, that she had an upstanding living with nice furniture, flatscreen-TV etc. And her case is just one amongst tens of thousands. Controversially the cost of supporting an individual like the helpless poor Carina comes from taxes paid from 4 families of 8 individual working adults. And as a result of this, every Dane is greeted on their first birthday, with a debt secured in state bonds of close to US$160.000. Society is eating itself by the tail.

            ●   1. The importance of how they see themselves and not how others see them.
            ●   2. Always look up to, and listen to people who believe in themselves and express it.

            ●   3. Regardless what’s said or done - no one can put you down. Only you can put you down.

                     examine your feelings for false pretences.

One of the biggest problems in this world (which this book proves) is that contentment can be and is misused to manipulate others. I therefore (in some way) agree with one idea presented in socialism; more precisely a theory applied by social-democrats. ‘All people should be provided with the same (if possible) opportunities in society’. Yet, my opinion only applies to psychological opportunities and absolutely not economically.

Regardless of where one is situated in the world, contentment is an absolute universal need. A need, which in my personal opinion has reached its highest limits when simply found within. Not influenced by surroundings or anything fictive. Pure contentment from no sources what so ever. Simply contentment from within. Contentment can be found (which this book once again proves) in social benefits. Yet again fictive contentment - amongst other things such as religion, money and objects etc. We have all been put on earth in order to fight evil; again accomplished in one way only, simply by bettering ourselves. To fight evil from within.

We are all put on this earth equally but all have different upbringings. Some with unfortunate disabilities. Yet only one thing truly sets us apart - our mind. In other words we are not all the same psychologically. And therefore cannot all (because of psychological boundaries) grab the opportunities provided for us in society. As a libertarian I believe in more or less no economical restrictions. Mine is mine and yours is yours. Libertarianism can absolutely work. Yet one thing is missing to make it ideal. The same psychological opportunity for all – Libertarraism.

● Libertarraism - Earth connection (both feet on the ground). The belief that psychology, if implemented in society in the right ways, would be the root to solving most of society’s problems. Perhaps even all.

I believe if implemented, that this cognitive process would not only lower levels of domestic violence, child abuse and crime in general etc. In other words make society safer and eventually saving money on crime fighting, but it would also raise intelligence levels of the public. Like anything Libertarraism would be a process, not truly in effect until habituated through numerous generations. As even seeking therapeutic help would be a cognitive process in itself. I therefore call upon society, not the government, but corporate society and the educational system, to stand together and fight against socialism through charity. By, in some way, implementing and making therapy or psychology freely available to all society’s citizens.

The question (in this case) Americans should ask themselves is “Does America want to stand together, and spend a little on charity, thereby helping America to stay libertarian? Or does America want to take the risk of becoming socialism, eventually ending up paying an even higher cost with the tax increase of socialism and by losing what America’s prosperity relies most on? And what truly made me fall in love with America - America’s mental freedom of liberated mentality?

"I try to be the best I think I can be and it’s not important to me, what others think, as long as that satisfies me - the goal has thereby been set and reached, for a lifetime to be free" - Mikkel Clair Nissen

If you like my work. Please support my effort and spread the word. Feel free to add yourself to the e-book's blog. Where you can participate in the debates and simultaneously receive updates and news about my social-psychological research. I also welcome you as a Facebook friend by clicking here.

Kindest Regards

Mikkel Clair Nissen

Revolutionary anti-socialism activist